Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Unit Manager Porter and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
