Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez-Jacome v. USA
as 2:2011cv02159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alberto Perez-Jacome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Van Houten v. Fernando et al
as 5:2010cv03227
Plaintiff:
James E. Van Houten
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, Tonya Taylor and C. J. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reedy et al v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2010cv03155
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Reedy , Todd Deal , Grant Nixon and others
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Matterson v. Freyaldenhoven et al
as 2:2010cv02192
Plaintiff:
Virginia L. Perez-Matterson
Defendant:
Kristine Freyaldenhoven, Lowe, Hoehn, Jurani & Freyaldenhoven, M.D.'s CHTD. and Saint Luke's South Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Merryfield v. Jordan et al
as 5:2009cv03259
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Merryfield
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Linda Kidd, Cory Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Chester
as 5:2008cv03307
Petitioner:
Charles William Perez
Respondent:
C Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Collins v. Daniels et al
as 5:2008cv03212
Plaintiff:
Chase Corbin Collins
Defendant:
Gary Daniels, (fnu) Strong, Leo Herrman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
