Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havens v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00870
Defendant:
N.P. R. King, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Havens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00149
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Morris et al
as 4:2017cv00155
Petitioner:
Ricky Shannon Pierce
Respondent:
Timothy Morris and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00095
Petitioner:
Ricky Shannon Pierce
Defendant:
Earnest Lee and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Union Co Sherrifs Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Patrick H. Pierce
Defendant:
Union Co Sherrifs Dept., Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, Jimmy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Nickson et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Darrin Dieuntay Wilson
Defendant:
Unknown Nickson, Unknown Hogdon, Unknown Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
