Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Pierce v. USA
as 3:2012cv00384
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Clifton Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Galloway v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Galloway
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Officials of Stone County Miss. Corr. Facility, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. United Home Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
Roland Pierce
Defendant:
United Home Life Insurance Company and Shawn L. Harness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Griffin v. Pierce et al
as 4:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Antwon Griffin
Defendant:
Unknown Pierce, Daniel Baker and Unknown Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cellular South, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Cellular South, Inc. and Cellular South, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and John Does A-J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Ballard v. Pierce et al
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dean Scott Ballard
Defendant:
Connie Pierce, Debra Platt, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
James R. Pierce
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Huynh et al v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ngo Huynh, All Plaintiffs, Bruce Glanemann and others
Defendant:
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., Fleetwood Canada, Ltd., Fleetwood Homes of North Carolina, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
