Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Carter v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Pierce Carter, Crestine Lee, Adi Gordon and others
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pierce v. Gavigan et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierce
Defendant:
Marie Gavigan, State of Hawaii, John Does No. 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Gavigan et al
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierce
Defendant:
Marie Gavigan, Gary Yamashiroya, David Matsumiya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Connors et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierce
Defendant:
Clare Connors, David Ige and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Does 1-50 and Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jaune Pierce and Ralph Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitby v. Pierce
as 1:2019cv00085
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Defendant:
James W. Pierce
Plaintiff:
Bryant Whitby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
