Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wells v. Pierce et al
as 1:2024fp00100
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Wells
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., BOFA Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Pierce v. Concord Police Dept et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D. Pierce
Defendant:
Concord Police Dept and Salem Ma. Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierce v. Riverbend Mental Health
as 1:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Riverbend Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00297
Defendant:
Audrey Bantly and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Sig Sauer Inc. et al v. Freed Designs, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Check-Mate Industries, Inc., Check-Mate International Products, Inc., Nordon, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Freed Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wolfeboro, Town of v. Wright-Pierce, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wolfeboro, Town of
Defendant:
Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Puiia et al v. Lee Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00199
Defendant:
Michael Daley, Paula Desaulnier, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Puiia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
