Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Pierce et al v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections et al
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Pierce and Moses Matthews
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon III and others
Amicus Curiae:
Roy A. Cooper, III and Joshua H Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fite v. Brooks et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Raven Fite
Defendant:
Regina Brooks, Jamarcus Nance and Raymond Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Price et al v. Pierce et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Sergeant Shatana Latice Jones, Mark Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Chandler Price, Michael Price and I. P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly v. Wayne County et al
as 5:2019ct03137
Defendant:
Charles S. Grainger, Jose F. Arias, Anthony J. Santagata and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jean Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Wayne County et al
as 5:2019cv00186
Defendant:
Charles S. Grainger, Jose F. Arias, Anthony J. Santagata and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jean Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
