Cases 41 - 50 of 8,921
VAN HOOSER v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
GARY VAN HOOSER
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
WEST PENN POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
MCMAHON et al v. GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2021cv05660
Plaintiff:
GREG MCMAHON and ADAM GOLDBERG
Defendant:
GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RYAN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOOKS et al v. GREAT AMERICAN WELDING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01387
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOOKS and JEROME DOWE
Defendant:
GREAT AMERICAN WELDING COMPANY, LLC and RILEY POWER GROUP, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
as 2:2021cv04217
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
