Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pratt v. Biden
as 3:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Pratt
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pratt v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Shawn Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cuevas v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv01688
Plaintiff:
Santos Cuevas
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Jesse Wm. Barton, Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Pratt
as 3:2020cv01897
Defendant:
Pratt
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 3:2019cv00382
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Pratt
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Estate of Castaneda v. Conway et al
as 3:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Estate of Castaneda and James Blume
Defendant:
Jack K. Conway, Chase Bank, Lisa Marie MacCarley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 2:2017cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Pratt
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
