Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gubbala v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Gubbala
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rao v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03133
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barbara Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus v. Rao et al
as 2:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus
Defendant:
Aarthi S. Rao and Manickam Narayana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. Mukunda et al
as 1:2012cv02761
Plaintiff:
Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Beejadi Mukunda and Deepa Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rao v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21591
Plaintiff:
Arun P. Rao
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brett v. Rao
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brett
Defendant:
Upamaka S Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall-Rao et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2010dp20058
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Hall-Rao and Angelo S. Rao, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLane Foodservice, Inc. v. Rao et al
as 2:2010cv00840
Defendant:
Gita Rao, Saanil Hospitality, Inc., Ganesh Ponneri Rao and others
Plaintiff:
McLane Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brett v. Rao
as 3:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brett
Defendant:
Upamaka S Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Wiltz v. State of New Jersey et al
as 2:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Defendant:
State of New Jersey, Somerset County Superior Court, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
