Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Purcell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
Kevin Purcell and Rebecca Purcell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Guevara v. Margoles et al
as 0:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Michelle Margoles, Laura Provinzino, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gordon
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Walker v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Victoria Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hamilton v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hamilton
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cormier v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Cormier
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jacob v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jacob
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Long v. D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN et al
as 0:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Long
Defendant:
D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN, Ramsey County Correctional Facility-Workhouse, A.P.S.-Advance Practice Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and Rebecca Froehlich
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
