Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Four Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,250.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2020cv02318
Defendant:
Four Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,250.00) in United States Currency
Claimant:
S. Robertson, Jamarcus Golden and Brandi Pinkney
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $295,062.71 et al
as 1:2012cv01076
Defendant:
Funds in the Amount of $295,062.71, Funds in the Amount of $294.02, Funds in the Amount of $38,129.93 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ira N. Stockton, Charles Hawes, Dawg House Distribution and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1998 Mazda Protege LX et al
as 1:2012cv01041
Defendant:
1998 Mazda Protege LX and Norinco 1911 .45 Cal Pistol
Claimant:
James E Robertson and Magdalena F Silva-Banuelos
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee, 4676 Highway 41N, Springfield, Tennessee, 204 Lawrence Lane, Springfield, Tennessee and others
Claimant:
Marie Murphy, in her capacity as Special Deputy Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance for the State of Tennessee, and as Statutory Liquidator/Receiver of Smart Data Solutions, LLC, et. al , F&M Bank , Bart S Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Valued at $10, 450.00 Seized from Franklin E. Robertson on March 20, 2009
as 3:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Assorted Jewelry Valued at $10, 450.00 Seized from Franklin E. Robertson on March 20, 2009
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
