Cases 1 - 10 of 14,040
-Scott v. Richards et al
as 4:2024cv03398
Plaintiff:
Christopher -Scott
Defendant:
John S. Richards and Jing Zhao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Revvity Health Sciences, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03389
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Scott
Defendant:
Revvity Health Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jourdan v. Stanislaus et al
as 3:2024cv03399
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Jourdan
Defendant:
Selvi Stanislaus, Jeanne Harriman and Leslie A. Yorston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McClintock v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv01599
Petitioner:
John Scott McClintock
Respondent:
Gena Jones and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carol Scott v. Zenwise LLC
as 2:2024cv04673
Plaintiff:
Carol Scott
Defendant:
Zenwise LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al
as 2:2024cv04470
Plaintiff:
Michael Mente
Defendant:
Traveon Rogers, Scott Oliver and Scott Oliver Law LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tennyson v. County Of Monterey et al
as 5:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
Trisha Tennyson
Defendant:
County Of Monterey, Monterey County Animal Control, Salinas Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
