Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brent v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Brent
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Yolanda Tanner, Douglas Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 8:2014cv01608
Plaintiff:
Tanea Tanner
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Theresa Todd
Cross_claimant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Theresa Todd
Cross_defendant:
Theresa Todd and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanner v. Shearin et al
as 1:2014cv00070
Petitioner:
James S. Tanner
Respondent:
Bobby P. Shearin and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner v. State of Maryland
as 1:2013cv03218
Petitioner:
James S. Tanner
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snyder et al v. Knight
as 1:2011cv01565
Plaintiff:
Janet Snyder and Janet L. and Steve M. Snyder
Defendant:
Austin Tanner Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tanner et al v. Aramark Corporation
as 8:2008cv01551
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bryce Tanner and Darrick Zigler
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tanner v. Fairfax County Office of the Sheriff
as 8:2008cv01288
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bryce Tanner
Defendant:
Fairfax County Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office
as 8:2008cv01160
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bryce Tanner
Defendant:
Nordstrom Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
