Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Rousan v. Custer et al
as 1:2012cv00595
Plaintiff:
Yazan Farouk Rousan
Defendant:
Custer, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Circuit Court of Bedford County, Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2012cv00127
Respondent:
Circuit Court of Bedford County, Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Jermaine Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Barry et al
as 1:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Kenard E. Johnson
Defendant:
Stan Barry, Tanner and Aramark Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Barry et al
as 1:2012cv00272
Defendant:
Stan Barry, Tanner and Aramark Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Micheal Anthony Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Barry et al
as 1:2012cv00271
Defendant:
Stan Barry, Tanner and Aramark Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Isaih E. Harris, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Ader et al
as 1:2011cv00601
Defendant:
F. Hanes Byerly, Neil Creighton, Harry F. Byrd, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust Company, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tanner v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00084
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Orval Dewey Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00666
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
United States Of America v. Tanner
as 3:2009mc00028
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Pat T. Tanner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
