Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GRUBB v. MEADE et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY GRUBB
Defendant:
JEFREY MEADE, TANNER HURLEY and ISP TROOPER 9448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brook v. Prentice
as 3:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brook
Defendant:
Tanner Prentice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WARD et al v. TOWN OF NASHVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv02954
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WARD and TANNER WARD
Defendant:
BROWN COUNTY, INDIANA and Town of Nashville, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yepsen et al v. City of Crown Point, Indiana et al
as 2:2018cv00207
Estate_plaintiff:
Tanner Yepsen
Plaintiff:
Keith Yepsen and Lynnette Yepsen
Defendant:
The City of Crown Point , Pete Land , Officer Smulski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanner, Bey v. Ward et al
as 2:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Noble LaQundus Tanner, Bey
Defendant:
J Ward and Sgt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITZS v. ZORE et al
as 1:2013cv01052
Defendant:
SHIRLEY ARNOLD, H. KENNARD BENNETT, MARY HOELLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL MITZS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., DANAWITZ, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
GUY CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
UWUA:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CUMMINGS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2013cv00235
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., DANAWITZ, M.D. STEPHEN DANNEWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
GUY CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
