Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Garcia v. C. Zeller, et al
as 2:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Garcia and Panchito
Defendant:
M. Ware, White, C. Zeller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson County v. Park
as 1:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jackson County
Defendant:
Waring Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ware v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00286
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, General Motors Company and Town and Country Chevrolet
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Ware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ware v. U.S. Department of the Interior
as 1:2017cv01412
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Ware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ware et al v. North Central Industries, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
C.R., E.W. and Kori Ware
Defendant:
Fundz 4 Kidz, Inc., North Central Industries, Inc. and Aaron Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1261 Federal Hazardous Substance Act
Charlton v. Yepez et al
as 2:2016cv00901
Defendant:
Sgt. Arguello, S. Bruning, J. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohler v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2014cv01879
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Peter Kerns and others
Plaintiff:
Kashon Nathaniel Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Park v. City of Ashland
as 1:2013cv01590
Defendant:
City of Ashland
Plaintiff:
Waring Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
