Cases 61 - 70 of 1,294
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00165
In Re:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brent Lee Newbold
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
McGrath v. eLiquitech, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01829
Plaintiff:
Amanda McGrath
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McGrath v. eLiquitech, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Amanda McGrath
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
Romulo Torres
Defendant:
Botanic Tonics, LLC, 7-Eleven, Inc. and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
McGrath v. eLiquitech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Amanda McGrath
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Heflin v. Speedway LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kelly Heflin
Defendant:
Speedway LLC, 7-Eleven Inc, Speedway LLC Individually and doing business as Speedway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60460
Plaintiff:
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2023cv20966
Plaintiff:
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
