Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,197
Volcimus v. Uhler et al
as 9:2024cv00581
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Volcimus
Defendant: Donald Uhler, Jay Skiff, A. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kosolapov v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03174
Plaintiff: Eugene Kosolapov
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff: Daniel Jackson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Encarnacion v. Irby
as 24-1133
Plaintiff: SAMUEL ENCARNACION
Defendant: MICHELLE FOGGIE, clerk of the bronx supreme court criminal division, JOHN SAMPUGNARO, Motions Clerk of the Bronx Supreme Court Criminal Div., SANDRA IRBY, assistant deputy counsel for the new york state office of court administration and others
Romanyk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Christopher Peter Romanyk
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martucci v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff: Barbara A. Martucci
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McCarthy v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff: Liam McCarthy
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hernandez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03157
Plaintiff: Omar Hernandez
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff: Tina Marie Miller
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Aguino v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03155
Plaintiff: Besaida Aguino
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?