Cases 1 - 10 of 131
MEARS v. CASALE et al
as 2:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEARS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE N. CASALE, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arcona v. Camden County Drug Court et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEST v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. WEST, JR.
Defendant:
TPR J. D'ANGELO, DSFC G. WREN, DET II M. RIBCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUFF v. ZEE et al
as 1:2023cv22823
Plaintiff:
BRIONNE CUFF
Defendant:
DT. DOUGLAS ZEE, TROOPER WALKER, TROOPER FLOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOSS v. PITTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv22351
Petitioner:
HORATIO JOSS
Respondent:
YOLANDA PITTMAN, JOHN TSOUKARIS and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOSLEY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE N. MOSLEY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv03535
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE N. MOSLEY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LONGO v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 2:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONGO
Defendant:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, CHAIRWOMAN MELINDA N. COONROD, COMMISSIONER RICHARD DAVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
