Cases 41 - 50 of 89
MadPlume v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Nethaniel Elmer Rae MadPlume
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tony Marvin Doyle
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couture v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Joseph Louis Couture
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackcrow v. Lake County Montana et al
as 9:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Aloysius D. Blackcrow, Tyler F. Erickson, James R. Elverud and others
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Paul Briney, William Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Conover et al
as 2:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hesse v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Lake County Detention Center, Donald R. Bell, Steven N. Eschenbacher and others
Plaintiff:
William Lowrey Hesse, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Loenbro Pipeline et al
as 4:2021cv00041
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe individuals or entities 1-4, Loenbro Pipeline and Roosevelt R. Cedeno-Zambrano
Plaintiff:
Marina N. Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akers v. Conover et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Defendant:
J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld and Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Beaty v. Guyer
as 6:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Lynn Guyer
Plaintiff:
William N. Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boose v. FNP, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00164
Defendant:
FNP of Missoula, Inc. d/b/a First National Pawn, First National Properties, LLC, F N P of Montana, Inc. d/b/a First National Pawn and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Boose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
