Cases 1 - 10 of 305
Davies v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Daniel N. R. Davies
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beekman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ashley N Beekman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taddonio v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Taddonio, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blatche v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tashonn N. Blatche
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ali v. John Dow et al
as 8:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Abdul N. Ali
Defendant:
John Dow, John Dow #2, John Dow #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HTOO v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
ARKAR HTOO
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Ur M. Jaddou, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Paul v. Shelly et al
as 9:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Prinell Paul
Defendant:
Tobias Shelly, Onondaga County Correctional Facility, Richard P. Miori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
