Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 8:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C. Miller and Reagan Frins Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Woullard v. Branch, et al
as 23-14156
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A. ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
MILLER v. CENTURION et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ARTHERIO MILLER, SR
Defendant:
CENTURION, GILBERT NOE, PAUL A AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. BRANCH et al
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. MARTINEZ
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
REGGIE CUMMINGS
Defendant:
A ACOSTA MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 5:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgos
Defendant:
Alexis Acosta-Martinez, C Miller, Reagan Frincks Maye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNEED v. ACOSTA-MARTINEZ et al
as 4:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SNEED
Defendant:
A ACOSTA MARTINEZ, NAFINA LANGLEY, MICHELLE SCHOUEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01551
Defendant:
Agustin Martinez Acosta and Agustin Acosta Martinez
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
United States of America v. Acosta-Martinez et al
as 3:2020cv01559
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership Acosta-Garcia, Carmen Lucila Garcia-Rivera and Victor Manuel Acosta-Martinez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
