Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Galea v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Joseph Galea
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
Keritsis v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Archer v. UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., et al.
as 24-1569
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. ARCHER
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a foreign corporation, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, UNITEDHEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation and others
Ragan v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Michael Ragan, Tamim Altamimi, Fernando Sulichin and others
Petitioner:
KAUNDRIA WEST and Eduardo Archer Veloso Martins
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Chow v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chow
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Vikram Luthar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Citribel N.V. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Citribel N.V.
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
