Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Brondstetter et al v. Aguilar et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
David Brondstetter and Deborah Brondstetter
Defendant:
Oscar Aguilar husband doing business as Sky Blue Trucking and Jane Doe Aguilar wife doing business as Sky Blue Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Torres v. USA
as 4:2021cv00097
Petitioner:
Gerardo Aguilar Torres
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raland J. Brunson
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar et al v. Management & Training
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Management & Training
Plaintiff:
Arlene Dungan, Veronica Hernandez, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Aguilar-Macias v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00911
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Angelica E. Aguilar-Macias
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Vincente v. MAV Media et al
as 1:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Vincente
Defendant:
MAV Media, Scot Mathews, Maverik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
