Cases 1 - 10 of 979
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cantrell v. Maplecrest et al.,
as 9:2024cv80475
Plaintiff:
Lisa Cantrell
Defendant:
Maplecrest and Paula Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80478
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80473
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rashley v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80470
Plaintiff:
Kyle Butler Rashley
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80472
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BUTLER v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
TERRY LEON BUTLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
