Cases 1 - 10 of 6,553
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01606
Plaintiff:
Clayton Brown
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER, LISA DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Witt
as 5:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Brown
Defendant:
Isaac G. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
