Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sectra Communications AB v. Absolute Software Incorporated et al
as 2:2023mc00053
Plaintiff:
Sectra Communications AB
Defendant:
Absolute Software Incorporated and Mobile Sonic Incorporated
Petitioner:
Tracy Crowe and Crowe Consulting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Crow v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv08267
Plaintiff:
Eirena Llewellyn Crow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Meldrum v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2020cv02165
Defendant:
Skysong Innovations LLC, Unknown Cheng, Augustine Cheng and others
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Meldrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wescott v. Crowe et al
as 2:2020cv01383
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Colin Ross, Claire Davies and others
Plaintiff:
Carl A Wescott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fees v. Arizona State University et al
as 2:2020cv01131
Plaintiff:
Maximilian Soza Fees
Defendant:
Michael Crow, Arizona State University, Elizabeth Rosenkrantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Crowe v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02511
Plaintiff:
Sandra Crowe
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crow et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02600
Plaintiff:
Monica Crow and Glen Crow
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
