Cases 1 - 10 of 38,698
Ghieh v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Osama Ghieh
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DAVID A. BIRDSELL v. THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. BIRDSELL
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company, RPM International Inc., Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Doe (RJC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RJC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Wellington, et al. v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, et al.
as 24-3162
Plaintiff:
MONICA WELLINGTON and DAVID WELLINGTON
Defendant:
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, MARGARET LAKE, MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP and others
Kontis et al v. Mississippi Green Oil, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
David M. Kontis and Scott Shier
Defendant:
Mississippi Green Oil, LLC, Thomas J. Moore III and Charles T. Hill
United States of America v. Curry
as 24-3169
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ELMO CURRY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
