Cases 1 - 10 of 1,849
Zito v. Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jordan Zito
Defendant:
Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation, Tammi Riggs, Second Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kern v. Drummond et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stephen R.F. Kern, Jr.
Defendant:
David Drummond and Tasheena Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rau v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
David Campbell Rau
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and NCPA
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zito v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jordan Zito
Defendant:
Ryan Sullivan, David Clifton, Washoe County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Panda Express, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
David Edwards
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Morales-Sandoval v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
David Morales-Sandoval
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PacketFabric, Inc. v. Ward
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
PacketFabric, Inc.
Defendant:
David Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Chet Rigney, Tasheena Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
