Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-3622
Respondent:
A. DUTTRY, DR. EDINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Joanna Olson, et al
as 20-3618
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. EDINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. JOANNA MARIE OLSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters et al
as 3:2020cv02433
Defendant:
Edinger, D. Fassero, A. Duttry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem Millhouse v. BOP, et al
as 20-3589
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW EDINGER, JESSIE AYERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Michael Gorbey v. Chambers, et al
as 20-3170
Defendant:
MR. BRICKARD, Assistant Warden, MR. FORD, SIS - (SIA), MR. BOHLIN, Executive Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Olson et al
as 3:2020cv01713
Defendant:
A. Duttry, Unknown Named Owners at Rueters Geisinger Eye Institute, Dr. Joanna Marie Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Stapleton v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2020cv01581
Defendant:
Lieutenant Shirk, Mr. Spaulding, Dr. Kevin Pigos and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gorbey v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2020cv01513
Defendant:
Dr. K. Pigus, Warden S. Spaulding, Captain J. Konkle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
