Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Williams v. Spearman et al
as 2:2019cv00486
Defendant:
J. Fannon and M.E. Spearman
Plaintiff:
Gentry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino v. Beccera et al
as 3:2017cv05118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marino
Defendant:
Xavier Beccera, Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Services, Alameda County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnett v. Arana, et al.
as 2:2016cv01630
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
J. Arana, J. Fannon, M. Goldy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connsero v. Foulk et al
as 2:2014cv01541
Plaintiff:
Michael Connsero
Defendant:
F Foulk, Lewis, M Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant:
Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv01364
Plaintiff:
Tony Austin Gant
Defendant:
M.D. McDonald, R. Pyer, P. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Fannon, et al
as 2:2004cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jesse Washington
Defendant:
J Fannon , T Kissinger , G Hibbitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Downing et al
as 2:2009cv03431
Plaintiff:
Marvin Glenn Hollis
Defendant:
M. S. Downing, C. L. Brewer, M. J. Rainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amy Schneirow Fannon v. Nexicon Inc et al
as 2:2009cv07773
Plaintiff:
Amy Schneirow Fannon
Defendant:
Nexicon Inc, Sam Glines, Richard Urrea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Baldwin v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
Greogry V. Baldwin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Fannon, M. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
