Cases 21 - 30 of 800
IN RE: GONZALEZ
as 2:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
HERRIC GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Majik Enterprises
as 2:2023cv03855
Plaintiff:
Jamilette Gonzalez
Defendant:
Majik Enterprises and Malique T Neff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gonzalez v. Majik Enterprises et al
as 5:2023cv03855
Plaintiff:
Jamilette Gonzalez
Defendant:
Malique T Neff and Majik Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
GONZALEZ-LOPEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M GONZALEZ-LOPEZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES-GONZALEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO TORRES-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GONZALEZ v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
HERRIC GONZALEZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISON, MARIBEN GONZALES, DR. JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. THE 25TH POLICE DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv03327
Plaintiff:
HERRIC GONZALEZ
Defendant:
THE 25TH POLICE DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
