Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Cruz et al v. Keeling et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ernestina R. Cruz, H. S. and J. S.
Defendant:
Brooke Keeling, Jolene Natewa, Christina Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lowrey v. Collela et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Lowrey
Defendant:
Nancy Collela, Cheryl H Johnson, James Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Lawton et al
as 5:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Mark H Long
Defendant:
City of Lawton, James T Smith, Detective Melanie Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Mark Miller Toyota et al
as 2:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Mark Miller Toyota, Larry H. Miller Dealerships, Ford Corporate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes (PS) v. City of Lafayette et al
as 1:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
James H. Holmes
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Jd Mangat and Rick Bashor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vilela v. Office of Recovery Services, et al
as 23-4096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO VILELA
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF RECOVERY SERVICES, STATE OF UTAH CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, LIESA STOCKDALE, in her official and private capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
