Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Mazza v. City Of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10333
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mazza
Defendant:
City Of Boston, Frank J. Olbrys, Edward Kennealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Krua v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv13110
Plaintiff:
Rev. Torli H. Krua
Defendant:
Anthony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ayanna Pressley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Porter Jr v. Frommer et al
as 4:2023cv40153
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Nathan Frommer, Dept. of Mental Health, WRC+H and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Guan v. Berger et al
as 1:2023cv11147
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Wendy Berger, Latham, Luna, and Eden & Beaudibe Law Firm, Daniel H. Coultoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Emerling et al
as 1:2022cv12107
Plaintiff:
Rikkile Brown agent of d/b/a Political Petitioning of MA, Sean Murphy and Jeremiah Ulch
Defendant:
Kim Emerling, William H. Legault and Stephen A. Bohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Budreau
as 1:2022cv11990
Plaintiff:
Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey
Defendant:
James H Budreau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gould v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2022cv30116
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Land Court Department, Judge Gordon H. Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
