Other Statutes Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 150
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. LEONARD
as 1:2016mc00030
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant: WADE H. LEONARD, JR.
GRAHAM v. BENTSEN, et al
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff: JAMES GRAHAM
Defendant: TIM E. BENTSEN , CHARLES A BLIXT , LYNN CRUMP-CAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WILSON v. HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00445
Plaintiff: JAMES WILSON
Defendant: HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION , DAVID W BERSON , MICHAEL R HOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sorrell et al v. Bayer Cropscience
as 5:2016mc00010
Movant: William H. Sorrell , Peter E. Shumlin , Harry L. Chen and others
Respondent: Bayer Cropscience
Scrogham v. Reid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00045
Plaintiff: Floyd Scrogham
Defendant: Robert L. Reid , Scott B. Kauffman , Jerry R. Licari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. MORGAN
as 1:2016mc00021
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant: VICTOR H. MORGAN, JR.
W.R. VERNON PRODUCE COMPANY v. COFFEY'S PRODUCE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00157
Plaintiff: W.R. VERNON PRODUCE COMPANY
Defendant: COFFEY'S PRODUCE COMPANY, INC. , BENSON H COFFEY and TEENA H COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Pendleton v. Reid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00037
Plaintiff: Curtis Pendleton
Defendant: Robert L. Reid , Scott B. Kauffman , Jerry R. Licari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. MOORE
as 1:2016mc00013
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant: CHARLES H. MOORE, II
ECP COMMERCIAL I LLC v. BOAZ SHOPPING CENTER LLC
as 1:2016mc00011
Plaintiff: ECP COMMERCIAL I LLC
Defendant: BOAZ SHOPPING CENTER LLC, EDEN SHOPPING CENTER LLC, MAYODAN SHOPPING CENTER LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?