Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hallman v. USA
as 4:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamar Hallman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hallman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv04321
Plaintiff:
John Hallman
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Hallman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 5:2022cv00779
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA, AIG Claims, Inc. and AIG Insurance Company
Claimant:
Chasitty Kathy Hallman
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hallman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hallman v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv00780
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and AETNA Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hallman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hallman v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn, The Maintenance Department, Officer FNU Gruundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman Industries v. Albert Fouertie
as 1:2020cv00817
Plaintiff:
Hallman Industries
Defendant:
Albert Fouertie doing business as AppliancesConnection.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hallman v. The State of Texas
as 4:2020cv00686
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
