Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Midcap et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10699
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Midcap, David Daniel, David Thorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Parshall v. Select Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07508
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Select Bancorp, Inc., J. Gary Ciccone, Alicia S. Hawk and others
Hamby v. Select Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04118
Plaintiff:
John Hamby
Defendant:
Select Bancorp, Inc., J. Gary Ciccone, Alicia Speight Hawk and others
Wooten, Jr. v. Select Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06046
Plaintiff:
Sterling D. Wooten, Jr.
Defendant:
Select Bancorp, Inc., William L. Hedgepeth II, J. Gary Ciccone and others
Melendez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv09241
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
City of New York , Vincint N. Schiraldi , Sharun Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. City of New York et al
as 7:2012cv09241
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Probation, Vincint N. Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv09241
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Probation, Vincint N. Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Daniels (Dorval)
as 11-3076
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rasheed Daniels, AKA Screw, Ercel Hartfield, AKA Peabody, Gary Holmes, AKA Smooth and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Joel Dorval
Hedgepeth v. Village of Goshen et al
as 7:2009cv07280
Plaintiff:
Ella Mae Hedgepeth, Ella Mae Hedgepeth, Ella Mae Hedgepeth and others
Defendant:
Village of Goshen and James Watt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
