Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gibson et al v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Don Gibson, Lauren Criss and John Meiners
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, Compass, Inc., eXp World Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BNSF Railway Company v. Magin et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Pauline Magin, Angelika Salazar, Tiffany Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Swint v. Gregorious Games et al
as 4:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Gregorious Games, Greg Howard Smith and Greg Smith Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Bow Wow Properties I, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01631
Defendant:
Bow Wow Properties I, Inc. d/b/a Instacredit Automart and Bow Wow Properties Inc. doing business as Instacredit Automart
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andy Howard, Jr. and Andy Howard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Koch v. Parsons, et al
as 4:2020cv00873
Defendant:
Zachary C. Walker, Governor Michael L. Parsons, Eileen Weir and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Howard Koch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Howard v. Crown Holdings, LLC
as 4:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
Quainterri Howard
Defendant:
Crown Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
