Cases 1 - 10 of 2,023
Guangzhou Nuolin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Norline v. Laltitude LLC d/b/a PicassoTiles et al
as 2:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Guangzhou Nuolin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Norline
Defendant:
Laltitude LLC d/b/a PicassoTiles and Howard Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
(PS) Umberger et al v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
George P. Umberger, II, Lisabeth A. King and Savannah R. Bailey
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boson v. Shipt,Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
David Boson
Defendant:
Shipt,Inc. and Rob Howard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Ahava Property Management v. Howard Walfish et al
as 2:2024cv03143
Plaintiff:
Ahava Property Management
Defendant:
Howard Walfish and Does 1 to 10
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Shirley et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Richard Edwin Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(PC) Overstreet v. Moseley
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Ryan Overstreet
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
