Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Haynes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Howard Haynes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01607
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Howard
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Cothe Howard
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. City of Akron et al.
as 5:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Wright
Defendant:
City of Akron, Magistrate Mary Ann Mendlick, Leah Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. $9,930.00 in U.S. Currency, et al.
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,930.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Rosa Ceja, Adriana Jones and Howard Miller
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Handy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Howard Handy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00037
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Timothy Erin Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin, III v. Mundy 64058
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III
Defendant:
R. Bernard Mundy 64058
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reed v. Mikanadze et al.
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Howard Reed
Defendant:
Giorgi Mikanadze and Asap Gio Corporation
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
