Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Bynum v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06228
Plaintiff:
Elexuses Bynum
Defendant:
City of New York , Martin F. Horn , Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crichlow v. Fischer et al
as 1:2011cv00883
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow and Armando Colon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, John Doe, Ellen Youssef and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. New York State Correction Officer Carlton Noble et al
as 9:2010cv01518
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Mann
Defendant:
New York State Correction Officer Carlton Noble, New York State Corrections Officer Stephen Zuchowski , Captain "John" Chapin of The New York State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Pfau et al
as 9:2010cv01484
Plaintiff:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant:
Ann T. Pfau, Nancy M. Mangold, Benjamin Steinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Glover et al
as 1:2010cv08525
Plaintiff:
Kadarko James
Defendant:
Glover, Gaskins, Calise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Daniels et al
as 1:2010cv07540
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richard Mann
Defendant:
Susie Daniels, Diane Eisert and Dr. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Bellnier
as 9:2010cv00090
Petitioner:
Francis Mann
Respondent:
Joseph F. Bellnier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vega v. Hatfield et al
as 6:2009cv06346
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vega
Defendant:
Daniel W. Hatfield, Matthew A. Mann, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. Mann et al
as 1:2009cv00451
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Mann, Rogacki, T. Sticht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manns v. Warden USP Allenwood et al
as 3:2008cv00752
Petitioner:
Marc Anthony Manns
Respondent:
Warden USP Allenwood and Danbury District Attorney
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
