Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 301
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae: The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Mann v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv09381
Plaintiff: Judd Mann
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fritz, P.C. v. Mann
as 7:2022cv07523
Plaintiff: Farrell Fritz and Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Defendant: Howard Mann, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF PHILLIP MANN and Howard Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Granite Solutions Groupe, Inc. v. Pioneer Bancorp Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff: Granite Solutions Groupe, Inc.
Defendant: Pioneer Bancorp Inc., Pioneer Bank, Michael T. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mann v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 1:2022cv01872
Plaintiff: Michael Mann
Defendant: Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?