Cases 51 - 60 of 61
URS Corporation v. Isham et al
as 6:2009cv02955
Plaintiff:
URS Corporation, URS Corporation and URS Corporation
Defendant:
Charles W Isham, Barbara J Sease, Petrina Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Norris v. Mann et al
as 8:2009cv02577
Plaintiff:
Garron Ladon Norris
Defendant:
Ofc Mann and Ofc Lemmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Richardson et al
as 3:2009cv02537
Plaintiff:
Horace Mann Insurance Company
Defendant:
Quintin Richardson and Ross Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Jones v. Mann Bracken LLP et al
as 4:2009cv02481
Plaintiff:
Susan S Jones
Defendant:
Mann Bracken LLP, Ken Jarrett and Mrs Green
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Webb v. Mann Bracken LLP
as 4:2009cv02450
Plaintiff:
James T Webb
Defendant:
Mann Bracken LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hughey v. Regions Mortgage et al
as 6:2009cv02462
Plaintiff:
Debbie Hughey
Defendant:
Regions Mortgage, Union Planters Bank NA, Union Planters Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Bell v. Mann Bracken LLC
as 4:2009cv01484
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bell
Defendant:
Mann Bracken LLC and Mann Bracken LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kirsch v. Horace Mann Mutual Insurance Company
as 8:2008cv03088
Plaintiff:
Laura Jean Kirsch
Defendant:
Horace Mann Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mann v. Astrue
as 8:2007cv02966
Plaintiff:
Shirley Mann
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mann v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv01995
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Stan Burtt, Adrian Martell and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
