Cases 1 - 10 of 36
MANN v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL MANN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv03611
Defendant:
BEGUHN, OWENS, PAGE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH, DONALD G. DOWDEN, SEAN G. GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
MATT MYERS, ALL EMPLOYED OFFICERS and JOHN MARTOCCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00341
Respondent:
JEFFERY E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
CHARLES L. MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MANNS v. MARTOCCIA
as 1:2018cv02396
Plaintiff:
JOEY MANNS, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv01668
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL, KITCHEN STAFF and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
JOEY LAMONT MANNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv01609
Defendant:
MARRISA FISHER, MARTOCCIA and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
JOEY MANNS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MANN v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2015cv00363
Defendant:
CLINICAL DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR, LIEUTENANTS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2015cv00359
Defendant:
BENNETT BAKER, CLINICAL DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
