Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
MANN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2021cv01781
Plaintiff:
NANCY L. MANN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY as owner and operator of JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER - ROSS TOWNSHIP d/b/a KANE COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANNS v. PENNWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2021cv00582
Defendant:
PENNWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Plaintiff:
YVONNE MANNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROSKY v. BOROUGH OF AMBRIDGE et al
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. BROSKY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF AMBRIDGE, JAMES A. MANN and TIMOTHY DEPENHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMEIRI v. PAVLECIC et al
as 2:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
MELISSA PALMEIRI
Defendant:
GARY MATTHEW PAVLECIC , CHRISTOPHER MANN and BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAYCOSKY v. FIA CARD SERVICES, NA et al
as 2:2008cv00719
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. ZAYCOSKY
Defendant:
FIA CARD SERVICES, NA, MANN BRACKEN, LLC and NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
DUMAS et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DUMAS and CHESTER RIORDAN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARL WALKER, JOAN MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
