Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mayle v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv05693
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mayle
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayle v. Guyton et al
as 1:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mayle
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, Carmislia Turner, Brittany VanFleet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayle v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2018cv06210
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Mayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayle v. The State of Illinois
as 1:2018cv02924
Defendant:
The State of Illinois and Nirav D Shah
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv01261
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Annett Mauer, Ming Ze Ming Ze and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mayle v. The Congress of the United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv03417
Defendant:
The Congress of the United States of America , The United States of America , Steven Mnuchin and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayle v. Orr, et al
as 1:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mayle
Defendant:
David Orr, Lisa Madigan, Anita Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Piehl et al v. Baytree National Bank and Trust et al
as 1:2012cv01364
Plaintiff:
Matthew Piehl and Michael Lannon
Defendant:
Baytree National Bank and Trust , Baytree Lending , Baytree Bancorp Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
