Cases 31 - 40 of 762
Goolsby v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03437
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Morris Goolsby
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. L'ORAL USA, INC et al
as 1:2023cv15027
Plaintiff:
Veda Morris
Defendant:
L'ORAL USA, INC, SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and Strength of Nature LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wise v. Winnebago County Sherriff
as 3:2023cv50364
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wise
Defendant:
Winnebago County Sherriff, Gary Caruana, Robert Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. Rowland et al
as 3:2023cv03300
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Major Rowland, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Evans et al
as 3:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
C/O Evans, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Meyers
as 3:2023cv03301
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Dr. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Morris-Roberts v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13740
Plaintiff:
Marcia Benita Morris-Roberts
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
