Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris
Defendant:
Sheriff Fred Hughes, III, Sergeant Terrence Damon Harkley, Corporal Thomas Michael Bersch, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. City of Lumberton et al
as 7:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
Hampton Allen Morris
Defendant:
City of Lumberton and Chuck Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Debock v. City of Wilmington et al
as 7:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Debock
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, William S. Morris, Michael N. Habash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruth v. City of Creedmoor et al
as 5:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruth
Defendant:
City of Creedmoor, Robert G. Morris and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterman et al v. Causey et al
as 5:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dianna Peterman and B.P.
Defendant:
Pat Causey, Elizabeth Spillman, Melinda Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis et al v. Mitchel et al
as 5:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Defendant:
Charlotte Mitchel, Wendy Kirwan, Naomie Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
