Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Munoz v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Enrique Munoz
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cristo-Munoz Jr. v. Thompson et al
as 5:2023cv02657
Petitioner:
Juan Cristo-Munoz Jr.
Respondent:
PATRICIA THOMPSON, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MELENDEZ v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
WILBERTO MELENDEZ
Defendant:
WARDEN CHERYL STEBERGER, CAPTAIN JENKINS, MAJOR CHIRCHELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MUNOZ v. GOLDBERG, MILLER & RUBIN, P.C.
as 2:2021cv00297
Defendant:
GOLDBERG MILLER & RUBIN and GOLDBERG, MILLER & RUBIN, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Munoz Grace and GRACE MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WESTMINSTER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. Security National Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv02195
Plaintiff:
4207 Chester Ave. LLC, WESTMINSTER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, WALDY REYES and others
Defendant:
Security National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SERRANO-MUNOZ v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2018cv04983
Defendant:
TPR SHEARN, TPR HOLDEMAN, TPR ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SERRANO-MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
